- Cookies that enable provisioning of services you require.
- Cookies that inform NIC about your visit on the website www.nic.lv - your consent is necessary for use of these cookies.
Riga, 1 September 2023
Alternative dispute resolution proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the .LV Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “.LV Dispute Policy”) adopted by Network Solutions Department of the Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science of the University of Latvia (“NIC” or the “Registry”) shall be governed by the .LV Dispute Policy, these .LV Dispute Rules and also the Supplemental Rules for .LV Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules for .LV”) as posted on the website of the domain name dispute resolution service provider (the “Provider”).
In these .LV Dispute Rules:
An Expert shall be impartial and independent and shall have, before accepting appointment, disclosed to the Provider any circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubt as to the Expert’s impartiality or independence. If, at any stage during the alternative dispute resolution proceeding, new circumstances arise that could give rise to justifiable doubt as to the impartiality or independence of the Expert, that Expert shall promptly disclose such circumstances to the Provider. In such event, the Provider shall have the discretion to appoint a substitute Expert.
No Party or anyone acting on its behalf may have any unilateral communication with the Panel. All communications between a Party and the Panel or the Provider shall be made to a case administrator appointed by the Provider in the manner prescribed in the Supplemental Rules for .LV.
The Provider shall forward the file to the Panel as soon as the Expert is appointed.
In addition to the complaint and the response, the Panel may request, in its sole discretion, further statements or documents from either of the Parties.
There shall be no in-person hearings (including hearings by teleconference, videoconference, and web conference), unless the Panel determines, in its sole discretion and as an exceptional matter, that such a hearing is necessary for deciding the complaint.
Except in the case of deliberate wrongdoing, neither the Provider nor an Expert shall be liable to a Party for any act or omission in connection with any alternative dispute resolution proceeding under these .LV Dispute Rules.